The Mirror

When the suffering is unbearable

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story


The Mirror reporter

Have you ever heard of physician-assisted suicide? No? That makes sense because here in the United States of America it is only legal in Oregon, Montana, Washington, Vermont, Hawaii, California, Colorado and Washington D.C., That’s eight out of 50 states. Isn’t that bizarre?

Physician-assisted suicide (PAS) is the suicide of a patient suffering from an incurable disease by taking a lethal drug provided by a doctor for this purpose. It helps someone who will eventually die but in a more controlled factor and in peace.

Physician-assisted suicide is the same as euthanasia. You probably heard the word euthanasia before because we use it for our animals when they have a serious terminal illness. Euthanasia is used through an IV whereas PAS is given in a pill form.

How come we can euthanize our pets when they have cancer but can’t euthanize our people when they have incurable cancer? It’s a battle that has many aspects that come into play with it.

Those who don’t agree with PAS believe that to end certain people’s lives doesn’t end suffering, it just passes on the suffering to someone else.

Society needs to learn compassion and address a patient’s pain and other problems. With PAS there’s not just a definite end your life because you want to. It’s to end your life in an appropriate way, on your time, to end your suffering. It’s something that patients who are thinking about this will have discussed with their family. They might not all agree with it but the family will support he or she in their decision.

Right now, in Canada, this is highly being debated, which shows that having the will to die in utterly bad situations can be good when suffering can get to be too much. PAS is not an easier way to commit suicide. It’s a way for people who are suffering to end their suffering.

The American Medical Association opposes PAS and says it is “fundamentally incompatible with the physician’s role as healer, would be difficult or impossible to control, and would pose serious societal risks.”

In the case of Washington v. Glucksberg (1997), the Supreme Court ruled that the Due Process clause of the 14th Amendment does not guarantee an individual the right to PAS. The Court since ruled that individual states can have a legitimate interest in prohibiting PAS. The ruling made it clear that legalizing or criminalizing PAS is a matter of states’ rights.

Even in states where it is legal, there is not much demand for PAS. In 2015, 132 people died by PAS. Similarly, in Washington in 2015 there were 166 deaths due to PAS. Only 24 PAS-related deaths were recorded by Vermont from 2013 to 2016. If PAS was legal in all 50 states and accounted for 0.25 percent of deaths in 2014 (2,596,993), there would have been 6,492 physician-assisted suicides.

Complications that occur during PAS are almost never reported. The main reason may be because doctors are not present when the patient takes the lethal dose. A 10-year study of PAS in Oregon found that physicians were not present in about one-fourth of the cases. But the reason may also be that physicians are merely underreporting the actual number of complications. A lead author of one of Oregon’s official reports on PAS said there is no systematic way of finding out and recording complications other than “asking physicians.” She also acknowledged, “After they write the prescription, the physician may not keep track of the patient.”

This year, Wisconsin is considering having the organization death with dignity a part of their state. The mission of the Death with Dignity National Center is to promote death with dignity laws based on our model legislation, the Oregon Death with Dignity Act, which provides an option for dying individuals and to stimulate nationwide improvements in end-of-life care.

Physician-assisted suicide in a topic that is really not discussed. Yet, we should choose to discuss it because it is always important to know your options when it comes to a terminal illness and what kind of death you choose to have.


8 Responses to “When the suffering is unbearable”

  1. Madison Rindahl on November 14th, 2018 11:02 AM

    Great job on your article! I really didn’t know much about assisted suicide and my view on it had changed in a good way. I agree that it needs to be talked about more. Great information I really loved the title because it drew me in.

  2. Rachel Placeway on November 14th, 2018 8:32 PM

    I knew a little about PAS, but I really didn’t take a side on the issue. Now seeing both sides more in depth I am starting to lean more to one side because of how well the article is written.

  3. Willow on November 16th, 2018 10:56 AM

    Wonderful article. I never really heard of PAS before now but I am glad I know something about it now.

  4. Hlee on November 16th, 2018 11:05 AM

    I’ve heard of this topic before and I agree that people should have the right to choose to have PAS. It’s only right since it’s their body, their pain, and their suffering.

  5. Bryant VanRossem on November 16th, 2018 11:05 AM

    This was a great article. It was well written and brought up some good points about why we use it on pets and only in 8 states can use it to end a person’s suffering. Great job.

  6. Soren Luther on November 16th, 2018 11:17 AM

    This is a very interesting topic. You did a good job addressing many different factors of this issue. Keep up the great work!

  7. Justice Chukwuemeka on November 16th, 2018 11:44 AM

    Great Article. On the spiritual point of view, it might be immoral to help someone commit suicide. On the science point of view, it is a way of relieving patients from suffering. I guess it is up for people to decide what they want. But remember; karma is real.

  8. Lauren Huebner on November 19th, 2018 8:05 AM

    Good job with a topic that is unfamiliar to many people. I agree with you that people with terminal illnesses should be able to use PAS. I feel like it needs to be more regulated before it becomes legal.

The Mirror intends for this area to be used to foster healthy, thought-provoking discussion. Comments are expected to adhere to our standards and to be respectful and constructive. As such, we do not permit the use of profanity, foul language, personal attacks, or the use of language that might be interpreted as libelous. Comments are reviewed and must be approved by a moderator to ensure that they meet these standards. The Mirror does not allow anonymous comments, and The Mirror requires a valid email address. The email address will not be displayed but will be used to confirm your comments.

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.


Reflections of the SPASH Community
When the suffering is unbearable